The Legalities of selling a firearm....

Rifles, Machineguns, Mortars, etc...
Post Reply
User avatar
Flesh Thorn
Ranger
Posts: 5607
Joined: March 5th, 2003, 2:12 pm

The Legalities of selling a firearm....

Post by Flesh Thorn »

My FFL dealer had his license taken by the BATF today. He had legally sold several firearms to an elderly gentleman. This gent in turn sold several at a flea market and one was to a convicted felon/ informant. The BATF gave my dealer the option of giving up his FFL or being prosecuted. He gave it up! The elderly gent, who does not have a FFL, had seventy guns confiscated both at the market and his residence and $1000 in cash. It seems that not having a FFL doesn't protect you when you might sell to the wrong person.
A Co. 3/75 Ranger Regt. HQ Section Dec 85-June 86.
HSC USAITC June 86-April 88
NAVSEA, 2014 to Present




Psalm 144:1 A Psalm of David. Blessed be the LORD my strength, which teacheth my hands to war, and my fingers to fight:
User avatar
McD
Ranger
Posts: 5242
Joined: February 16th, 2004, 3:52 pm

Post by McD »

SO a dealer is responsible for a weapon they sell to a legitimate buyer who in turn sells it to a felon? That semms ... well.. fucked up!
C 2/75, 1st Plt, Wpns Sqd 76-79
RS 3-78
Mattoon's Goons

A 'Veteran' -- whether active duty, discharged, retired, or reserve --
is someone who, at one point in his life, wrote a blank check made payable to 'The United States of America,' for an amount of 'up to, and including his life.'
User avatar
fireranger
Ranger
Posts: 2153
Joined: August 25th, 2004, 2:02 pm

Post by fireranger »

I smell Democrats.
3 rd. Plt. C Co. 2/75 1993-1997, RS 10-94 (Navigators)

But, I'm funny how? Funny like a clown? I amuse you? I make you laugh? I'm here to fuckin' amuse you?
User avatar
RGR_Dan
Ranger
Posts: 929
Joined: March 31st, 2004, 6:33 am

.

Post by RGR_Dan »

I know nothing about FFL's and the BATF. My spidey senses are telling me that you ain't gettin' the whole story from you're dealer.
95-98 Aco. 3/75 2nd plt Weapons Sqd
98-01Hco 121st LRS
Former LEO
Former Contractor
LEO (round 2)
Chiron
Ranger
Posts: 11919
Joined: February 17th, 2004, 12:49 pm

,

Post by Chiron »

McD wrote:SO a dealer is responsible for a weapon they sell to a legitimate buyer who in turn sells it to a felon? That semms ... well.. fucked up!
If then legal sellers of say T-80 tanks sells to a buyer with a legal end user certificate all legal and nice. The buyer in turn sells the tank or tanks to an unauthorized buyer say Iraq that means that the original seller although legal (Russia) would be liable and suffer the penalty of an illegal arms dealer.

Correct? :?
RS Class 5-82
French Commando 11-83
LRSLC Class 5-87
U.S. Army 1980-1984 and 1987-1990
---------
“Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity.”
George S. Patton
Chiron
Ranger
Posts: 11919
Joined: February 17th, 2004, 12:49 pm

Re: ,

Post by Chiron »

Terry Welshan wrote:
Chiron wrote:
McD wrote:SO a dealer is responsible for a weapon they sell to a legitimate buyer who in turn sells it to a felon? That semms ... well.. fucked up!
If then legal sellers of say T-80 tanks sells to a buyer with a legal end user certificate all legal and nice. The buyer in turn sells the tank or tanks to an unauthorized buyer say Iraq that means that the original seller although legal (Russia) would be liable and suffer the penalty of an illegal arms dealer.

Correct? :?
Only if they sold said tanks for cash, if the traded them for oil they would have the U.N.s approval. :wink:
I'm in the wrong business!
RS Class 5-82
French Commando 11-83
LRSLC Class 5-87
U.S. Army 1980-1984 and 1987-1990
---------
“Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity.”
George S. Patton
User avatar
fireranger
Ranger
Posts: 2153
Joined: August 25th, 2004, 2:02 pm

Re: .

Post by fireranger »

RGR_Dan wrote:I know nothing about FFL's and the BATF. My spidey senses are telling me that you ain't gettin' the whole story from you're dealer.
My thoughts also - there has got to be some release in liability to the FFL if he conducts a legal transfer. If the BATF was able to go after an FFL who did a legal transfer that ended up being illegal sometime after he has released all interest in the firearm, nobody would go through the headache of getting and keeping an FFL.

There has to be more to the story. My .02 cents.
3 rd. Plt. C Co. 2/75 1993-1997, RS 10-94 (Navigators)

But, I'm funny how? Funny like a clown? I amuse you? I make you laugh? I'm here to fuckin' amuse you?
User avatar
Flesh Thorn
Ranger
Posts: 5607
Joined: March 5th, 2003, 2:12 pm

Re: .

Post by Flesh Thorn »

RGR_Dan wrote:I know nothing about FFL's and the BATF. My spidey senses are telling me that you ain't gettin' the whole story from you're dealer.
Hmmmm.......After sleeping on it, I am thinking the same thing. He isn't fighting it and that makes me think that he thinks that maybe he has fucked up somewheres.
A Co. 3/75 Ranger Regt. HQ Section Dec 85-June 86.
HSC USAITC June 86-April 88
NAVSEA, 2014 to Present




Psalm 144:1 A Psalm of David. Blessed be the LORD my strength, which teacheth my hands to war, and my fingers to fight:
User avatar
Get-Her-Done Ranger
Ranger
Posts: 59
Joined: April 22nd, 2005, 6:32 am

Post by Get-Her-Done Ranger »

Thats fucked up.........so what about the tank theory????? Right/Wrong....Wrong/Right???? Yep, sounds like there is more to the story..??!!
1/75 HHC, commo
RS 6/96
TIB 7/94-10/97
Post Reply

Return to “Weapons of War”