LRS Deactivation

Mother_Benning · Post by **Mother_Benning** » November 14th, 2005, 4:01 pm

E/51 is the only one left, and they are gone as soon as they get back from downrange.

rthree · Post by **rthree** » January 21st, 2006, 10:05 pm

Mother_Benning wrote:E/51 is the only one left, and they are gone as soon as they get back from downrange.

WRONG!!

rthree · Post by **rthree** » January 22nd, 2006, 8:47 am

ATL in F CO, RGR 01-05. F CO isn't going anywhere. All programs are up and running, deployment had great LRS missions, have a great 1SG. Everything that I have read about Corps LRS on here is wrong. Deadwood has been and will be sent packing.

AbnRgr289 · Post by **AbnRgr289** » January 22nd, 2006, 8:52 am

rthree wrote:ATL in F CO, RGR 01-05. F CO isn't going anywhere. All programs are up and running, deployment had great LRS missions, have a great 1SG. Everything that I have read about Corps LRS on here is wrong. Deadwood has been and will be sent packing.

You were just told in your intro to refrain from posting until you've done a thorough Recon of the AO, and get a good understanding of the community here.

How about do so!

You also need to get an avatar.

wellfed · Post by **wellfed** » January 22nd, 2006, 9:21 am

rthree...The question was "Is Corps LRS deactivating also? No one said anything about them already deactivated. I should know I was the last 1SG for one of the deactivated Division LRS. Only Corps will keep them as of right know until full modulation is complete. Corps will be assassed at that time. RSTA have picked up dismounted recon/surv etc. for Bde level Ops..there will be no division Recon/surv assets (that I presume will come from Corps)

Goog · Post by **Goog** » January 22nd, 2006, 11:17 am

rthree wrote:ATL in F CO, RGR 01-05. F CO isn't going anywhere. All programs are up and running, deployment had great LRS missions, have a great 1SG. Everything that I have read about Corps LRS on here is wrong. Deadwood has been and will be sent packing.

Like everyone else said, Post an intro shithead. Until then "Shut your Cock Holster".

23LRS · Post by **23LRS** » February 24th, 2006, 3:25 pm

armyofjuan wrote:im in 82nd lrsd and they talked about deactivating us this month but they decided to wait another year. there is a lot of talk about the diactivation of all the lrs units.

I was in 9ID lrs, they deactivated us and moved us to I Corps which lasted a few years, and then they gave our mission to F/425 (NG)

Ranger Bill · Post by **Ranger Bill** » February 24th, 2006, 6:03 pm

Is this an OPSEC thing?

Mother_Benning · Post by **Mother_Benning** » February 24th, 2006, 9:53 pm

Battlefield Surveillance Brigades (BfSB) under the new Force Mod will be the new home of NG LRSU's, or so I have heard..........

effective 2008 and 2010.

wellfed · Post by **wellfed** » February 24th, 2006, 9:59 pm

Ranger Bill wrote:Is this an OPSEC thing?

No, It's not. If you were talking MTOE and capabilities, I would have to say yes

23LRS · Post by **23LRS** » April 6th, 2006, 2:54 pm

The Army is really dropping the ball on this one.

Silverback · Post by **Silverback** » April 6th, 2006, 5:18 pm

23LRS wrote:The Army is really dropping the ball on this one.

You definitely have to explain this remark...

23LRS · Post by **23LRS** » April 7th, 2006, 9:34 am

ou definitely have to explain this remark...

I feel like the LRS units should be full time AD solidiers, with dedicated funding, schools and training.. By relegating them to the NG they are putting the on the back burner.