Sir,
I can't even get into some of the areas
Active Duty NCOs
Moderator: Site Admin
-
Silverback
- Ranger
- Posts: 20119
- Joined: March 7th, 2004, 11:06 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Your avatar is....mesmerizing.:)
Anyhow, it's very apparent why a website would screen and categorize those who might want to join. ArmyRanger.com is a perfect example of why. It's just that I know that a site ran for professional NCO's, by professional NCO's couldn't be anything BUT quality....that is if it receives universal buy-in.
I honestly don't feel slighted nor marginalized; my life will go on. I'm just looking for any real-time resources so I can "re-G" myself up. I'm headed back to the field Army in a short amount of time and I know that there has been revolutionary change in the short 15 months I've been in recruiting land. What better resource than one designed for and by active duty NCO's?
Anyhow, it's very apparent why a website would screen and categorize those who might want to join. ArmyRanger.com is a perfect example of why. It's just that I know that a site ran for professional NCO's, by professional NCO's couldn't be anything BUT quality....that is if it receives universal buy-in.
I honestly don't feel slighted nor marginalized; my life will go on. I'm just looking for any real-time resources so I can "re-G" myself up. I'm headed back to the field Army in a short amount of time and I know that there has been revolutionary change in the short 15 months I've been in recruiting land. What better resource than one designed for and by active duty NCO's?
4-17IN, 7th ID(L) - 1987-1991;2/327IN, 101st ID - 1997-2001; 2-5IN, 25th ID(L) - 2000-2004
Ranger Class 3/97,4/97,5/97(Grad)
Ranger Class 3/97,4/97,5/97(Grad)
-
Silverback
- Ranger
- Posts: 20119
- Joined: March 7th, 2004, 11:06 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Actually it seems that the admins have (R) after their Rankgpatmac wrote:Your avatar is....mesmerizing.:)
Anyhow, it's very apparent why a website would screen and categorize those who might want to join. ArmyRanger.com is a perfect example of why. It's just that I know that a site ran for professional NCO's, by professional NCO's couldn't be anything BUT quality....that is if it receives universal buy-in.
I honestly don't feel slighted nor marginalized; my life will go on. I'm just looking for any real-time resources so I can "re-G" myself up. I'm headed back to the field Army in a short amount of time and I know that there has been revolutionary change in the short 15 months I've been in recruiting land. What better resource than one designed for and by active duty NCO's?
RC 2-87
3-75 84/85, 95/97
"thnks 4 pratn merku!"
3-75 84/85, 95/97
"thnks 4 pratn merku!"
Oh.
Well, I'll check back with my soldiers later and see if they've found it useful.
I'm not knocking recruiters, but there is a lack of real leadership they have to follow as an example, and since I think I can safely assume that that is a major facet of that site, it may get lost on them. However, anymore about 80-90% of recruiters are detailed, so maybe they'll take a liking to it.
Well, I'll check back with my soldiers later and see if they've found it useful.
I'm not knocking recruiters, but there is a lack of real leadership they have to follow as an example, and since I think I can safely assume that that is a major facet of that site, it may get lost on them. However, anymore about 80-90% of recruiters are detailed, so maybe they'll take a liking to it.
4-17IN, 7th ID(L) - 1987-1991;2/327IN, 101st ID - 1997-2001; 2-5IN, 25th ID(L) - 2000-2004
Ranger Class 3/97,4/97,5/97(Grad)
Ranger Class 3/97,4/97,5/97(Grad)
