And you thought .50 was big?

Rifles, Machineguns, Mortars, etc...
Vee
Ranger
Posts: 7810
Joined: February 13th, 2004, 12:59 pm

Post by Vee »

I want one.

From local Wyoming paper:

"The elk numbers in the Big Horns have taken a dramatic drop of late...."
RSD 96-99
User avatar
McD
Ranger
Posts: 5242
Joined: February 16th, 2004, 3:52 pm

Post by McD »

What a beast. Need a squad to carry the ammo.
C 2/75, 1st Plt, Wpns Sqd 76-79
RS 3-78
Mattoon's Goons

A 'Veteran' -- whether active duty, discharged, retired, or reserve --
is someone who, at one point in his life, wrote a blank check made payable to 'The United States of America,' for an amount of 'up to, and including his life.'
User avatar
Gutlisswundr
Ranger
Posts: 16
Joined: June 30th, 2004, 9:36 pm

Post by Gutlisswundr »

That would make for a nice coyote rifle. :P
B co. 1/75 98-01
User avatar
B 2/75
Ranger
Posts: 525
Joined: January 21st, 2004, 11:14 am

Post by B 2/75 »

Guys, look closely at this thing.

RIFLE WEIGHT 33 LBS

If that won't stretch yer neck and shrink yer cock as your core slides down your spine humping the bitch, I don't know what will. And that's JUST THE DAMN RIFLE.
I'll bet the goddamn ammo weighs in at nearly pound a round.

This isn't providing "LIGHT FIGHTERS" with anything except more hernias.

Sure, it looks nice, and I'd be first in line to shoot the shit out of some Rag position with one, but issue me one? NO WAY. Gimmie an M-4A1 instead.
- ALL THE WAY -
1st Plt B 2/75 - Sniper
Ranger classes 4-80 & 9-80
3/60 INF 9th ID
2/278 ACR TN NG
3/319 INF 80TH ID
4/4 FA
11th USAFAD (8" Special Wpns)
D/96 CA (A)
JIATF-East (Counter Drug)
478 CA (FID/UW) (IFOR/SFOR)
5 SFG (A) (OIF 1)
USSOCOM - Retired AUG 09
Biometrics Mgmt Office (AFG) (SAIC)
PM DoD Biometrics - Operations (SAIC)
User avatar
1276N
Ranger
Posts: 65
Joined: February 15th, 2004, 12:56 pm

Post by 1276N »

Bet that thing knocks the fillings in your teeth out when you shoot it
User avatar
Silverback
Ranger
Posts: 20118
Joined: March 7th, 2004, 11:06 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by Silverback »

B 2/75 wrote:Guys, look closely at this thing.

RIFLE WEIGHT 33 LBS

If that won't stretch yer neck and shrink yer cock as your core slides down your spine humping the bitch, I don't know what will. And that's JUST THE DAMN RIFLE.
I'll bet the goddamn ammo weighs in at nearly pound a round.

This isn't providing "LIGHT FIGHTERS" with anything except more hernias.

Sure, it looks nice, and I'd be first in line to shoot the shit out of some Rag position with one, but issue me one? NO WAY. Gimmie an M-4A1 instead.
It's ony a few pounds heavier than the M240. 9 more
RC 2-87
3-75 84/85, 95/97
"thnks 4 pratn merku!"
User avatar
Tankkiller275
Ranger
Posts: 36
Joined: January 17th, 2003, 4:48 pm

Post by Tankkiller275 »

SHIIIIIIIT!!!

That is light! Hell, try humping the 90mm with full combat load. Been there, done that! Even the Carl G is/was heavier with the rifle and ammo. When we got the Carl G, we thought we were all in heaven.

RLTW!
A Co. 2/75, WPN's Plt - Ratbastard, A-T 90-93, Class 8-91

"I will not disgrace the soldier's arms, nor abandon the comrade who stands by my side, but whether alone or with many, I will fight to defend things sacred and profane. I will hand down my country not lessened, but larger and better than I have received it."
Ancient Athenian Oath
User avatar
Runner
Ranger
Posts: 524
Joined: March 29th, 2004, 5:34 pm

Post by Runner »

In the backround/watermark picture thing on the very right, is that a suppressor or just look like it?

Malarkey
A co 3/75 '07-'10
User avatar
the_machine
Tadpole
Posts: 145
Joined: July 6th, 2004, 7:29 am

Post by the_machine »

Must have one hell of a recoil.
11-M(B co. 3/15 inf, 24th inf)

Why did I re-enlist?...the scenery changes, the pay is good and i get to play with dynamite.
Spartan

Post by Spartan »

Does anyone know if that will be offered to civilians now that the SAW Ban is over?
FireFinder
Paratrooper
Posts: 1064
Joined: April 30th, 2004, 12:07 pm

Post by FireFinder »

Ranger Spartan,

I will make the assumption that it will be a NFA-restricted "Destructive Device" if it was available to the civilian market. I don't believe that it will be available for civilian purchase.

Now, if you were to get your Class III FFL and could get your hands on one to demo to LE agencies, thats a whole different story.
13R2P B BTRY (TAB), 26th FA (ABN), 18th FA BDE (1984-1988)
11C (4.2" Mortar) CSC 2/124INF, FLARNG (1988-1989)
User avatar
Parabellum
Ranger
Posts: 3878
Joined: February 25th, 2004, 5:32 pm

Post by Parabellum »

bberkley wrote:Ranger Spartan,

I will make the assumption that it will be a NFA-restricted "Destructive Device" if it was available to the civilian market. I don't believe that it will be available for civilian purchase.

Now, if you were to get your Class III FFL and could get your hands on one to demo to LE agencies, thats a whole different story.
Even if it is classified as a "destructive device" it will only be a $5 transfer tax. You won't need a class III FFL to own it just register it through the ATF. The Barrett does not require a tax stamp.
"We spoke to them in the only language they understood - the machine gun."

HHC 1/75 Oct 98-Mar 99
B co 1/75 Mar 99-Apr 04
ROC RSTB RIP/PRC Cadre Apr 04-May 06
A co 1/75 May 06-Jul 08
HHC 1/75 Jul 08-Mar 09

RS 3-99
ChipOnShoulder

Post by ChipOnShoulder »

Imagine getting hit by that fuckin' monster. Not a prayer in the world!!!!!!
Post Reply

Return to “Weapons of War”