How to become a Ranger medic

Questions and Answers about obtaining an Option 40 Contract and other routes to serving as a Ranger in the US Army.
User avatar
Justin_SoCal
Embryo
Posts: 8
Joined: May 22nd, 2007, 12:47 pm

How to become a Ranger medic

Post by Justin_SoCal »

Thank you for taking the time to read and respond to my post. Let me start with a little about me, followed by questions about what I want to achieve serving in the strongest military in the world.

Background

I’m currently in the process of putting together a warrant officer packet to enter the aviation side of the Army. Ideally I would like to fly an Apache, but I understand there can be a big difference between what you want, and what you get in the military. I take my AFAST (Alternate Flight Aptitude Selection Test) three weeks from today, followed by my flight physical and submission of my warrant officer packet.

I initially went in to talk to my recruiter about being either a combat medic, or being a helo pilot. He asked if I thought about being a Ranger medic, and of course I said hell yeah. I have always dreamed of being a Ranger / Navy Seal, but never looked into the requirements of either. I looked into both being a pilot / Ranger and decided to put in a warrant officer packet to fly initially.

I’ve gone to MEPS to take my ASVAB (80 AFQT, 118 GT), and passed my physical and airborne physical, but haven’t signed anything. I figured I can become a Ranger medic if I fail my flight physical, or don’t get accepted. I have been physically training myself as if I’m going into the RIP, (according to Ranger training guides I’ve found) so I can ship out to basic ASAP if I don’t get accepted as a WO.

I have one major law violation I’m worried about, but my recruiter said it isn’t a problem for putting in my WO packet (I don’t know if it differs being a Ranger, but I know both require a top secret clearance). In June 2003, I was charged with felony evasion, and reckless driving (I swear it wasn’t me!). I was only convicted of a misdemeanor because I looked somewhat guilty, but they didn’t have a solid case. It falls under a misdemeanor my recruiter found out after doing some searching, (it can differ if you’re initially charged with a worse crime) and said it just requires a waiver.

Questions

1. Is my run-in with the law going to disqualify me from a Ranger medic contract? I’ve only had one speeding ticket, and 2 parking tickets since then (if that matters).

2. I want to be a combat medic, airborne, and would like to have the ranger tab. I’m a little confused on what I would want my contract to say. I know they have an 91W (Medical specialist) Option 40, is this the same AIT as regular medics with the option of being a Ranger? Does this also mean that I won’t be airborne? I’ve done a lot of reading on this topic, and can’t find an answer applying towards the Ranger/medic part.

3. I’ve found some misleading information on Option 40 contracts. Does this mean I get a shot in RIP, and possibly nothing else, or am I “guaranteed a shot to join the ranks of the 75th Ranger Regimentâ€
Thank you for serving our country
Invictus
Ranger
Posts: 4741
Joined: September 5th, 2005, 10:46 am

Post by Invictus »

Step 1. Educate yourself as much as possible to avoid stepping on your dick with your first post...

Step 2. In the even step 1 was too much work for you, allow me to do the work for you...because that's how it works in the Army. :roll:

Go post an intro hero, and may GRITS have mercy on your soul.
User avatar
Justin_SoCal
Embryo
Posts: 8
Joined: May 22nd, 2007, 12:47 pm

Introduction completed

Post by Justin_SoCal »

Step 1 is completed Ranger Invictus Sir

No it's not too much work for me Sir

Thank you for your response Ranger Invictus Sir
Thank you for serving our country
User avatar
Charlie 51
Ranger
Posts: 1045
Joined: January 5th, 2007, 4:26 pm

Re: Introduction completed

Post by Charlie 51 »

Justin_SoCal wrote:Step 1 is completed Ranger Invictus Sir

No it's not too much work for me Sir

Thank you for your response Ranger Invictus Sir
Patronize him again motherfucker and Matti will ban your ass before your 4th post. We are not your pals and could give a shit about your California Dreamin. Matter of fact I think the mods should change your name to that right now.
C Co 2/75 Weapons
Classes 4-5/93

"Even if you're on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit there" - Will Rogers
EvilCouch
Ranger
Posts: 2602
Joined: March 21st, 2006, 12:32 am

Re: Introduction completed

Post by EvilCouch »

Charlie 51 wrote:
Justin_SoCal wrote:Step 1 is completed Ranger Invictus Sir

No it's not too much work for me Sir

Thank you for your response Ranger Invictus Sir
Patronize him again motherfucker and Matti will ban your ass before your 4th post. We are not your pals and could give a shit about your California Dreamin. Matter of fact I think the mods should change your name to that right now.
Since I'm feeling generous, I'll remind the motivated young man that most Rangers are enlisted. We sergeants get the twitch whenever someone Sirs us.
Clueless Joe(Sand hill): May 98 - May 99
Tabless Bitch (Bco 3/75): May 99 - May 01
REMF (11th Regt): May 01 - Feb 04
Leg Team/Squad leader (HHC 1-503, 2ID, OIF): Feb 04 - Dec 05
World's worst webcomic
User avatar
Justin_SoCal
Embryo
Posts: 8
Joined: May 22nd, 2007, 12:47 pm

Post by Justin_SoCal »

Ranger Charlie 51 and Ranger EvilCouch

What is the most proper form of addressing a higher ranking person if it's not sir? Maybe it's civilian ignorance, but sir is more of a respectful term than a form of patronizing someone. Do I just address them by their title, or what's the correct way in the service?
Thank you for serving our country
BadMuther
BANNED
Posts: 7970
Joined: March 14th, 2003, 2:13 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by BadMuther »

My OPINION on your criminal records is that you should be okay, however I'm not a recruiter or the one who will do your background.
User avatar
someguy
Tadpole
Posts: 39
Joined: March 25th, 2007, 3:29 pm

Post by someguy »

Justin_SoCal wrote:Ranger Charlie 51 and Ranger EvilCouch

What is the most proper form of addressing a higher ranking person if it's not sir? Maybe it's civilian ignorance, but sir is more of a respectful term than a form of patronizing someone. Do I just address them by their title, or what's the correct way in the service?
Check your PM box.
Pirate.
RTO
BANNED
Posts: 9104
Joined: April 28th, 2005, 12:34 pm

Post by RTO »

Justin_SoCal wrote:Ranger Charlie 51 and Ranger EvilCouch

What is the most proper form of addressing a higher ranking person if it's not sir? Maybe it's civilian ignorance, but sir is more of a respectful term than a form of patronizing someone. Do I just address them by their title, or what's the correct way in the service?
Image
User avatar
Justin_SoCal
Embryo
Posts: 8
Joined: May 22nd, 2007, 12:47 pm

Post by Justin_SoCal »

Damn, that's so me. I can do 3 push ups, but I'm really good at eating twinkies. Do you think I can be a Ranger?
Thank you for serving our country
User avatar
RangerX
Ranger
Posts: 7062
Joined: May 4th, 2005, 9:08 am
Has thanked: 1 time

Post by RangerX »

Justin_SoCal wrote:Damn, that's so me. I can do 3 push ups, but I'm really good at eating twinkies. Do you think I can be a Ranger?
:roll:
C Co 3/75 88-90 (Just Cause)
124 MI(LRSD) 90-91 (Desert Storm)

Repeal the 16th, enforce the 10th.

ΜΩΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

"I come in peace. I didn't bring artillery. But I'm pleading with you, with tears in my eyes: If you fuck with me, I'll kill you all." Gen. James Mattis

Panem Et Circenses

My safe space
RTO
BANNED
Posts: 9104
Joined: April 28th, 2005, 12:34 pm

Post by RTO »

Justin_SoCal wrote:Damn, that's so me. I can do 3 push ups, but I'm really good at eating twinkies. Do you think I can be a Ranger?
Shut up. Do pushups.
User avatar
bulldogg
Tadpole
Posts: 226
Joined: February 12th, 2007, 5:18 am

Post by bulldogg »

Is it too early to get squares on this one?
USA/87-89/91A
USAR/91-93/91E
INARNG/93-95/44B
"Aut viam inveniam aut faciam"
KW Driver
Ranger/Moderator
Posts: 6581
Joined: December 8th, 2004, 2:20 pm

Post by KW Driver »

Justin_SoCal wrote:Damn, that's so me. I can do 3 push ups, but I'm really good at eating twinkies. Do you think I can be a Ranger?
that is some patronizing bullshit on your part. go reread the rules. as far as I'm concerned, that's stike 2.

and where did you find out that pilots and Rangers need Top Secret clearences?
A Co & HHC 3/75 '93-'98.
RS 10-94.


200 meters of green shit next to a river in the desert does not qualify as a "Crescent of Fertility" -me

"The meek shall inherit the earth, one meter wide and two meters long" -Lazarus Long
User avatar
Justin_SoCal
Embryo
Posts: 8
Joined: May 22nd, 2007, 12:47 pm

Post by Justin_SoCal »

KW Driver wrote:
Justin_SoCal wrote:Damn, that's so me. I can do 3 push ups, but I'm really good at eating twinkies. Do you think I can be a Ranger?
that is some patronizing bullshit on your part. go reread the rules. as far as I'm concerned, that's stike 2.

and where did you find out that pilots and Rangers need Top Secret clearences?
Ranger KW Driver

I mean this in no disrespect, but that is not patronizing anyone but myself. The definition of patronize by Merriam-Webster.com is as follows:

2 : to adopt an air of condescension toward

To break this down further, condescension or condescend is defined as:

2 : to assume an air of superiority

As stated in my post, I'm making fun of myself, and my hypothetical appreciation for twinkies. I am not making a patronizing mark about rangers, but more of a (bad) joke about myself.


As far as reading the rules. I have tried my best to due so. This is the first forum I've been a member of, and I didn't know what stickys where until recently.


As far as the security clearances, I am mistaken about the clearance for being a Ranger. I read this post here and thought it was the same type of clearance needed as a warrant officer pilot. Post:
viewtopic.php?p=372840&highlight=ranger ... nce#372840

After doing some research on my own, to find info showing what my recruiter told me about having a top secret security clearance, I found out he was wrong (recruiters wrong/lie, never! (yes, I am patronizing a my recruiter, forgive me)). Here is the link I found that states you need a secret security clearance:

http://www.usarec.army.mil/hq/warrant/

I do not mean to step on the toes of anyone due to my lack of knowledge of forums, or military incite, but I am in the process of researching them in depth.

-Justin_SoCal
Thank you for serving our country
Post Reply

Return to “Recruitment Process”