Is Combat making Ranger school unneccesary?

Three phases and 62 days of hell. This section named in honor of MAJ John Whyte who was taken from us on 04/17/05.

Is Combat making Ranger school unneccesary?

Postby rgrokelley » December 24th, 2010, 3:30 pm

Combat Making Ranger School Unnecessary?

http://www.military.com/news/article/co ... =army-a.nl
A & C Company, 3rd Ranger Battalion 1984-1986
2/325, 82nd Airborne 1979-1984
F Company, 51st LRSU 1986-1988
5th Special Forces Group 1989-1995
3rd Special Forces Group 1997-1999
RS - DHG 5-85
User avatar
rgrokelley
Triple Canopy
 
Posts: 2644
Joined: February 6th, 2008, 1:57 am
Location: Barbecue Township, North Carolina

Re: Is Combat making Ranger school unneccesary?

Postby Rangertom » December 24th, 2010, 4:37 pm

Actually it is even more necessary. Soldiers of ALL ranks think combat is driving in large sometimes overly armor vehicles, living on FOBs and calling in all sorts of assets to win a fight, and missions are typically short. OPORDs have all but died most units try to use a bastardized form of a CONOP to replace it. PCC/PCI’s are usually lacking. Fire and maneuver skills are severely deficient. Units go nuts when then can’t simple ask an air asset to destroy something or tell them where the enemy is.
I have seen some really …. Questionable stuff passes as tactics here at JRTC. Crossing LDAs without security UNDER A STREET LIGHT THREE TIMES. (I came out of my OC role and gave a class on crossing danger areas in the middle of force on force). No understanding of proper MOUT movement. Thinking the ‘ranger file’ is the best technique for moving in wide open terrain during the day when contact is expected. Sector sketches have to be pried out of some units and the ones that do them look like something my daughter drew in preschool. Field craft has gone to hell etc etc etc. All of that is without the stress of sleep and food deprivation and being graded.
I personally believe combat is a skill level 1 and 2 task. The unit that masters skill level 1 and 2 will destroy any enemy unit it comes in contact with. I understand some of this is not new. But low ‘intensity warfare’ has not helped it has hurt the fundamentals.
I have seen OEF/OIF/FSO rotations and multiple units Leg/mec/abn here at JRTC. Some better than others none are a T at even most skill level 1&2 tasks.
I would recommend that deploying unit in effect go through a sort of pre ranger as a BN.
$0.02
"The existence of a tool should not predicate reliance upon that tool."
"Stupid is supposed to hurt"
Ranger class 6-99
Alphatraz 3/75 98-00
7th SFG 02-06
F/51 LRS 06-08
JRTC 10-11
Currently: Correcting a big mistake back in the ´Q´ as an O.
User avatar
Rangertom
Ranger
 
Posts: 217
Joined: December 12th, 2008, 7:44 pm
Location: BRAGG

Re: Is Combat making Ranger school unneccesary?

Postby MarineRanger » December 24th, 2010, 5:41 pm

Good article ... I think this post in the comments section was a good analysis. .... except I believe RS is more than just a "combat simulator".


" The article is a little vague but I guess it's saying there are too few senior or junior NCO's volunteering for Ranger School? And that the reason they aren't is 1) they feel they've already proven themselves in real world combat and 2) they don't want to spend another 61 days away from family between deployments?
Well, no duh.
As terrific a tradition and leadership challenge as it is, Ranger School has always been a "combat simulator." We've been in real combat for the last 9 years. It's no shock troops don't feel the same need to earn a tab as "proof" of their ability as they did in the 90's. "
USMC 77-81
STA 2/9 3rd
Fox 2/9 3rd
RS 8-80 (5-4)
User avatar
MarineRanger
Ranger
 
Posts: 92
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 1:48 am
Location: Maryland

Re: Is Combat making Ranger school unneccesary?

Postby Richard Cranium » December 24th, 2010, 7:23 pm

RS is not the be all end all. I think most of us would agree with that; however, it IS the military's pre-eminent LEADERSHIP course.

Where do you need more competent, confident, seasoned leaders than in ACTUAL COMBAT?
"The way of the warrior is in training" ~Sun Tzu

Practice honesty, Fear nothing!




Done a few years in Light, Mech, and Airborne Infantry.

Class 03-07
User avatar
Richard Cranium
Ranger
 
Posts: 3073
Joined: March 27th, 2007, 3:40 pm
Location: Putting two in your breathers and one in your sneezer!

Re: Is Combat making Ranger school unneccesary?

Postby fatboy » December 26th, 2010, 6:14 pm

There lies the problem- there are several Soldiers, several Leaders even, that have been to combat, most of them numerous times, and have taken the fight to the shitheads continuously and effectively. That in their minds validates the mentality of fuck the Tab, its a bunch of bullshit. Why go back to high school when you already have a college degree right?
In my not so expert opinion, the value of Ranger School doesn't become apparent until several years later when you have some perspective on it. That's when you gain the most lessons from it- whether that lesson was how long can you perform with out rest to how can I motivate others when I'm dragging ass myself and everything in between. But unless RS can figure out a way to stay current on everything as well as impart something to the studs going through it, it will continue to become less and less relevant while real bullets are flying. Once the shooting stops though, there will be an upswing in guys wanting to attend, because it will revert back to being the measuring stick of combat skill.
RS 07 and 08-01 (I took the long tour in Florida)

1-508 ABCT
1-327IN
101st Pathfinder DS1
Iraqi Freedom 03-04, 05-06, 07-08
User avatar
fatboy
Ranger
 
Posts: 371
Joined: November 26th, 2006, 8:30 pm
Location: Within spitting distance of philly

Re: Is Combat making Ranger school unneccesary?

Postby MarineRanger » December 27th, 2010, 12:47 am

From a Special Ops training perspective, I thought it was excellent and would recommend if you plan to move into those kind of operations.

It teaches you how, you react to extreme exhaustion, starvation, and sleep deprivation. It gives you an opportunity to train yourself to master those instinctual drives, to be able to ignore them instead of having them, rule you.

My 8th and 9th patrols were the very last two of the class ... so I think I got a little 'extra' in that area. And if you want to make sure you get them, all you have to do is screw up real bad.
USMC 77-81
STA 2/9 3rd
Fox 2/9 3rd
RS 8-80 (5-4)
User avatar
MarineRanger
Ranger
 
Posts: 92
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 1:48 am
Location: Maryland

Re: Is Combat making Ranger school unneccesary?

Postby panthersix » December 27th, 2010, 12:27 pm

I thought the purpose of all "pre-combat" training is to try to reduce the need for "combat experience" to create a more effective and thus more survivable combat force. I think a better question would be whether or not qualification badges and tabs should be eliminated except for dress uniforms.
Doc Mac
Ranger Class 11-80
C.Co. WPNS 1/75 79-81
3rd Plt/498th Medevac 81-82
104th LRSD 92-93
422d CA BN (A) 94-97
118th ASOS 02-08
User avatar
panthersix
Ranger
 
Posts: 2899
Joined: June 15th, 2008, 12:27 am

Re: Is Combat making Ranger school unneccesary?

Postby MarineRanger » December 28th, 2010, 1:15 am

Panthersix,

My perspective may have been skewed, but it did seem to me that most people were in Ranger School for the wrong reasons. It seemed the majority were NOT there for the training, but only to get points towards promotions. And the whole process appeared to be quite politicized.

And I know one officer was there simply because Dolonega was his hometown, and he wanted the free airplane ride to visit family. What a waste of a slot.

I'm sure you're aware Marine Corp regs already disallow the wearing of the Tab on all marine uniforms. They are extremely strict about any service specific awards, and non U.S. awards too.

I'm not sure if a similar policy of no patches, etc. on BDUs, would be a plus or a minus for the Army. Maybe they could make it "optional" first. It would be interesting to see what would happen.
USMC 77-81
STA 2/9 3rd
Fox 2/9 3rd
RS 8-80 (5-4)
User avatar
MarineRanger
Ranger
 
Posts: 92
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 1:48 am
Location: Maryland

Re: Is Combat making Ranger school unneccesary?

Postby Roster#253 » December 29th, 2010, 4:43 pm

I can only speak to my own experience, but having RS under my belt as a field artillery officer being assigned to an airborne infantry company as an FSO was invaluable. Its more than just the premiere leadership school of the armed forces, it allowed me, and I have to imagine other like me without an infantry background, to hit the ground running when we showed up to our manuever units and do our jobs that much more efficiently.
RGR Class 8-00
82nd ABN (2nd BCT) 2000-2003 / OIF I
-CO FSO (C/2-325th AIR)
-PL/XO (B/2-319th AFAR)
-RSO (HSB/2-319th AFAR)
-BN FDO (2-319th AFAR)
Vet Center Readjustment Counselor (NJ)
User avatar
Roster#253
Ranger
 
Posts: 25
Joined: December 2nd, 2010, 8:16 pm

Re: Is Combat making Ranger school unneccesary?

Postby LJ_602 » December 30th, 2010, 4:44 am

There are alot of guys with the book ends (patches on both sleves) and a CIB and have a bad attitude about Ranger School. They figure they don't need it because they have been to combat and did just fine. But I see the guys with it do more and move harder and further than the guys without it, regardless of combat or not. They are always more motivated. Like one of my section leaders now. Brought in a Ranger Tab flag and paddles he bought in Florida. Everyone makes fun of him for it, but he is on top of everything and strives for combat readiness.

I havn't been in gound combat yet, but as a leader my tabbed guys are always my best guys. I know there are some turds that graduate from Ranger School, but atleast they are motivated turds.

And when you go to a board and they have 10 slots and 20 guys, who do you pick? Well who had a tab?
USS George Washington 97-00
HC-2 SAR 00-01
C CO 2-505 PIR 82nd ABN current
Ranger Class 1-11
User avatar
LJ_602
Ranger
 
Posts: 29
Joined: December 21st, 2010, 1:45 am
Location: Center of the Universe AKA Fort Bragg

Re: Is Combat making Ranger school unneccesary?

Postby centermass » March 23rd, 2012, 3:12 pm

Bumping this necro post after reading a few of the very same thoughts. He said it better than I could.

I was in Ranger Battalion and in Special Forces. I went to HALO school, attended the high-speed civilian driving and shooting schools. They were fun, but not nearly as important as the basic Infantry tactics that you learn in Ranger School. Mastering the basics is far more important for soldiering than the fun training that you see on television or in the movies. Enlisted and Junior NCO’s should be fighting each other hand over feet for a Ranger School slot.

No, I don’t think that a Ranger tab is the end all be all. Neither is a combat badge. For a lot of folks, it is a five-letter fashion statement on their uniform and that’s the wrong answer. It doesn’t make you better than anyone else, it makes you better trained, and when things get ugly in combat, fellow soldiers are going to be looking to you for a decision.

Think about it.



Link
RS 8-81
Mentor to Rock1/75
US Army Retired 1977-1999
User avatar
centermass
Ranger
 
Posts: 4249
Joined: February 26th, 2005, 7:32 pm

Re: Is Combat making Ranger school unneccesary?

Postby Jim » March 23rd, 2012, 7:18 pm

Many years ago, I was a SSG with a Vietnamese Ranger Battalion. I spent 17 months in the unit -- we went to Cambodia. I went through OCS and after Jump refresher, started Ranger School. Did the mountains twice, pinched a nerve. When I graduate, the Mountain camp commander, LTC Moose Yon said "jim, which is wrrse-Viet-Nam or Ranger School?" My answer was"Ranger school, if you fuck up in Viet-Nam, you die--if you fuck up in Ranger School, they make you do it again."
Ranger Class 13-71
Advisor, VN 66-68 69-70
42d Vn Ranger Battalion 1969-1970
Trainer, El Salvador 86-87
Advisor, Saudi Arabian National Guard 91, 93-94
75th RRA Life Member #867
User avatar
Jim
Ranger/Moderator
 
Posts: 14229
Joined: March 8th, 2005, 6:48 pm
Location: Northern Virginia

Re: Is Combat making Ranger school unneccesary?

Postby Worldweaver » March 23rd, 2012, 7:32 pm

Jim wrote: if you fuck up in Viet-Nam, you die--if you fuck up in Ranger School, they make you do it again."


Hahaha, well put Sir...I hope the LTC found the humor in it.
Go Tell the Spartans, stranger passing by, that here obedient to their laws we lie.
--Simonides

Bco. 1/75 2006-2010
RS 06-08
User avatar
Worldweaver
Ranger
 
Posts: 134
Joined: January 2nd, 2006, 2:35 am
Location: Purgatory

Re: Is Combat making Ranger school unneccesary?

Postby Jim » March 24th, 2012, 6:18 am

Worldweaver wrote:
Jim wrote: if you fuck up in Viet-Nam, you die--if you fuck up in Ranger School, they make you do it again."


Hahaha, well put Sir...I hope the LTC found the humor in it.

He told the story many times.
Ranger Class 13-71
Advisor, VN 66-68 69-70
42d Vn Ranger Battalion 1969-1970
Trainer, El Salvador 86-87
Advisor, Saudi Arabian National Guard 91, 93-94
75th RRA Life Member #867
User avatar
Jim
Ranger/Moderator
 
Posts: 14229
Joined: March 8th, 2005, 6:48 pm
Location: Northern Virginia

Re: Is Combat making Ranger school unneccesary?

Postby hobbit » March 24th, 2012, 10:51 am

Just lurking...
L Company Ranger
RVN 70/71
75th RRA Life Member

The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing. -Albert Einstein
User avatar
hobbit
LRRP/Ranger
 
Posts: 1858
Joined: December 7th, 2004, 6:09 am
Location: Bakalakadaka Street


Return to About Ranger School - In Honor of Ranger BattleBoar - RIP

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

sponsorship armi

 

 

 

 



Army Ranger Mojo Inc. 501(c)3 a non-profit organization supporting Army Rangers past, present and future.
Site Hosted: