Reflexive sights

Rifles, Machineguns, Mortars, etc...
Post Reply
Black 6
Ranger
Posts: 2619
Joined: May 26th, 2005, 12:02 pm

Reflexive sights

Post by Black 6 »

Has anyone had any experience with ATN sights? I am getting ready to purchase a reflexive sight and I am down to the;

EoTech XPS3
Image

Or the ATN Ultra Sight
Image

I have always disliked how much the Eo Techs block your line of sight. The ATN type of sight has better lines and is easier to see as I like placing it up on the hand rail, almost to the front sight post.

I would appreciated and help.
2/75 Blacksheep 92-93, 1/9 93-94
1759 society member

"You will know me by the scars I bear.
You will know me by the hate I swear."-OTEP

01010011 01110000 01100001 01110010 01110100 01100001 01101110 00101111 01001000 01100101 01110010 01101111 00101110
User avatar
fatboy
Ranger
Posts: 1058
Joined: November 26th, 2006, 12:30 pm

Re: Reflexive sights

Post by fatboy »

No real experience with the ATN sight, but some things to consider- from the looks of it, the aiming point on the ATN is going to be visible from the sides in low light conditions since it appears to be projected onto the glass vs. appearing inside the glass, so "they" can possibly pick you out as well, and the actual optic portion doesn't look to be to sturdy either. The EO tech on the other hand, I have had some experience with, and IMO, it's one of the best reflex sights out there. Everything from the reticle to the hood over the glass portion, to the reticle "moving" if the glass gets damaged. Not to mention instead of just a red dot, it has a dot with a ring around it, and the ring has tick marks so that you can get your hold offs for various ranges. For either sight, putting it far forward should be fine as long as your upper rail is anchored and not loose. And if there is any sight blockage, shoot with both eyes open :mrgreen:
RS 07 and 08-01 (I took the long tour in Florida)

1-508 ABCT
1-327IN
101st Pathfinder DS1
Iraqi Freedom 03-04, 05-06, 07-08
User avatar
Flesh Thorn
Ranger
Posts: 5596
Joined: March 5th, 2003, 2:12 pm

Re: Reflexive sights

Post by Flesh Thorn »

I have seen pictures of EoTechs that had taken rounds and still worked. I would go with an EoTech over the ATN any day.
A Co. 3/75 Ranger Regt. HQ Section Dec 85-June 86.
HSC USAITC June 86-April 88
NAVSEA, 2014 to Present




Psalm 144:1 A Psalm of David. Blessed be the LORD my strength, which teacheth my hands to war, and my fingers to fight:
BadMuther
BANNED
Posts: 7970
Joined: March 14th, 2003, 2:13 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Reflexive sights

Post by BadMuther »

The ATN is a cheapie and I doubt it would survive a strong impact. It's just not the same quality as a eo tech, aimpoint, acog, etc. I have one on my sig 556.

EO tech's are g2g and the model you displayed above is supposed to be the shiznit.

There is a reason Atn's are $150 and eo tech's 400+.

My two pesos.
User avatar
RangerX
Ranger
Posts: 7062
Joined: May 4th, 2005, 9:08 am
Has thanked: 1 time

Re: Reflexive sights

Post by RangerX »

Not knowing ATN products personally, the design looks...."flawed". EOTech is more streamlined, and a lot less like to snag & break. That ATN thing looks like it would probably hang & break pretty easily.
C Co 3/75 88-90 (Just Cause)
124 MI(LRSD) 90-91 (Desert Storm)

Repeal the 16th, enforce the 10th.

ΜΩΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

"I come in peace. I didn't bring artillery. But I'm pleading with you, with tears in my eyes: If you fuck with me, I'll kill you all." Gen. James Mattis

Panem Et Circenses

My safe space
User avatar
Strykerguy56
Tadpole
Posts: 40
Joined: July 22nd, 2008, 6:31 am

Re: Reflexive sights

Post by Strykerguy56 »

GSXRanger put me on to EOTechs when we first got over here and I've loved it ever since. I actually just picked up a BARELY used one for $200 off a guy that is done at the end of the tour.
dbmtrman
Ranger
Posts: 697
Joined: March 11th, 2009, 6:23 pm

Re: Reflexive sights

Post by dbmtrman »

I think you should go with an EO Tech, or Aimpoint, or ACOG sight. I reviewed an ATN sight that someone from my agency wanted to mount on his AR-15. I found it to be a little on the flimsy side. Not to Milspec standards either. We denied the usage on service weapons. EO Tech makes a reasonably priced unit that operates on 2 AA batteries.
RLTW!
RS 4/85
B Co. 1/75 84-86, HAAF
HQ 11 SFG (USAR) 86-87

"In the absence of orders, go find something and kill it."- Field Marshal Erwin Rommel
Post Reply

Return to “Weapons of War”